Radon exhalation and health hazard assessment for various ceramic tiles used in Bangladesh

Sopan Das; Shahadat Hossain

doi:10.35815/radon.v5.10473

Sopan Das Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission
Shahadat Hossain Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35815/radon.v5.10473

Keywords: radionuclides, tiles, radon, tiles radiation, tiles health hazard, radon exhalation, tiles radon, radon cancer risk

Abstract

Objective: Among various building materials, tiles are the most used decorative materials used worldwide. For the safe use of tiles at home and workplace it is required to select them properly based on radiation dose due to radon and gamma emission.

Experiments: Among various tiles available in the market, 25 different types of tiles were collected for this experiment. Collected tiles are then ground and stored in sealed cans for secular equilibrium. To measure gamma activity due to the radionuclides ²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th, ⁴⁰K, High Purity Germanium (HPGe) detector was used. To store radon gas emitting from tiles, a big box was used. The activity concentration was then measured by a radon detector (RadonEye) by placing it inside the box.

Results and discussion: It was observed that ²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th, ⁴⁰K activity varies from 45 – 89 Bq/Kg, 77 – 110 Bq/Kg, and 321 – 694 Bq/Kg. The radium equivalent activity varies from 198.32 – 280.46 Bq/Kg, less than the recommended value of 370 Bq/Kg set by UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). The activity concentration of radon varies from 31 – 71 Bq/m³. This is lower than the 300 Bq/m³ recommended by ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). The radon exhalation rate varies from 0.179 – 0.409 Bqm⁻²h⁻¹. To assess radiological hazards associated with the tiles samples air absorbed dose rate, internal and external hazard index, gamma index, annual indoor and outdoor effective dose rate, and dose due to radon were also calculated.

Conclusion: Though the estimated values for external and internal hazards are below the recommended values, they may be safe for adults. As children have thinner skin and breathe more air due to high breathing frequency, they may receive more radiation than adults. Moreover, they are at a greater risk because of their developing bodies and long life expectancy post-exposure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.
Deng W, Tian K, Zhang Y, Chen D. Radioactivity in Zircon and building tiles. Health Phys 1997; 73: 2. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199708000-00009

2.
ICRP. Protection of the public institutions of prolonged radiation exposure, Ann. ICRP29 (1–2) (Publication 82, Elsevier Sciences, B.V. New York, USA: International Commission on Radiological Protection); 1999; 10591–5153.

3.
UNSCEAR. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation, United Nations; 1993.

4.
Papastefanou C, Stoulos S, Manolopoulou M. The radioactivity of building materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2005; 266: 367–72. doi: 10.1007/s10967-005-0918-z

5.
Cogliano VJ, Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, et al. Preventable exposures associated with human cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1827–39. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr483

6.
EPA. Assessment of risks from radon in homes, air and radiation. Wasington DC, USA: United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2003, p. iv, EPA 402-R-03-003.

7.
Zeeb H, Shannoun F, World Health Organization. WHO handbook on indoor radon: a public health perspective. World Health Organization; 2009, pp. 1–16. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44149 [cited 11 October 2023]

8.
Harley NH, Chittaporn P, Medora R, Merrill R, Wanitsooksumbut W. Thoron versus Radon: measurement and dosimetry. Int Congress Ser 2005; 1276: 72–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.09.055

9.
Sciocchetti G, Sciocchetti A, Giovannoli P, et al. A new passive radon-thoron discriminative measurement system. Radiat Protect Dosim 2010; 141: 4. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq241

10.
Sahoo BK, Sapra BK, Kanse SD, Gaware JJ, Mayya YS. A new pin-hole discriminated 222Rn/220Rn passive measurement device with single entry face. Radiat Measure 2013; 58: 52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.08.003

11.
Das S, Kim J, Park J, Chang H, Cho G. A preliminary study on real-time Rn/Tn discriminative detection using air-flow delay in two ion chambers in series. Nuclear Eng Technol 2022; 54: 4644–51. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2022.07.019

12.
López-Coto I, Mas JL, Bolivar JP, García-Tenorio R. A short-time method to measure the radon potential of porous materials. Appl Radiat Isotopes. 2009; 67: 133–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.07.015

13.
Yu KN, Guan ZJ, Stoks MJ, Young EC. The assessment of natural radiation dose committed to the Hong Kong people. J Environ Radioact 1992; 17: 31–48. doi: 10.1016/0265-931X(92)90033-P

14.
Beretka J, Mathew PJ. Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial waste and byproducts. Health Phys 1985; 48: 87–95. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198501000-00007

15.
UNSCEAR. Sources, effects, & risks of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. New York: UN; 2000, vols. I & II, pp. 2–47.

16.
Xinwei L. Radioactivity level in Chinese building ceramic tile. Radiat Protect Dosim. 2004; 112: 323–7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch396

17.
Joel ES, Maxwell O, Adewoyin OO, Ehi-Eromosele CO, Saeed MA. Comparative analysis of natural radioactivity content in tiles made in Nigeria and imported tiles from China. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 1842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20309-0

18.
Dizman S, Keser R. Natural radioactivity in ceramic tiles and associated radiological hazards. Int J Radiat Res. 2019; 17: 245–52. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.17.2.245

19.
Turhan S, Baykan UN, Sen K. Measurement of the natural radioactivity in building materials used in Ankara and assessment of external doses. J Radiol Protect 2008; 28: 83. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/28/1/005

20.
Kumar A, Kumar M, Singh B, Singh S. Natural activities of ²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th and ⁴⁰K and in some Indian building materials. Radiat Measure. 2003; 36: 465–9. doi: 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00173-2

21.
Righi S, Albertazzi A, Guerra R, Jeyapandian M, Verità S. Natural radioactivity in Italian ceramic tiles. Radioprotection. 2009; 44: 413–9. doi: 10.1051/radiopro/20095078

22.
Lee SC, Kim CK, Lee DM, Kang HD. Natural radionuclides contents and radon exhalation rates in building materials used in South Korea. Radiat Protect Dosim 2001; 94: 269–74. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006499

23.
El Afifi EM, Hilal MA, Khalifa SM, Aly HF. Evaluation of U, Th, K and emanated radon in some NORM and TENORM samples. Radiat Measure 2006; 41: 627–33. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.09.014

24.
Krstić D, Nikezić D, Stevanović N, Vučić D. Radioactivity of some domestic and imported building materials from South Eastern Europe. Radiat Measure 2007; 42: 1731–6. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.09.001

25.
Siddeeg SM, Suliman MA, Rebah FB, Mnif W, Ahmed AY, Salih I. Comparative study of natural radioactivity and radiological hazard parameters of various imported tiles used for decoration in Sudan. Symmetry 2018; 10: 746. doi: 10.3390/sym10120746

26.
Kuzmanović P, Todorović N, Miljević B, Nikolov J, Knežević J, Vraničar A, et al. Natural radioactivity in ceramic tiles used in Serbian buildings. Roman J Phys 2019; 65: 805 (2020).