On electrokinetic soil radon mitigation: a first theoretical approach

  • Francisco J. Arias Department of Fluid Mechanics, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Keywords: Environmental radon, Radon mitigation, Electrokinetic remediation

Abstract

Electrokinetics and its potential significance with regard to soil radon (222Rn) mitigation is investigated. Whereas the use of electrical fields for chemical soil decontamination, also known as electrokinetic remediation (ER), is a consolidate commercial technology, however, its potential use to tackle the radon-soil problem has not yet been explored. One explanation behind is that traditional ER requires the use of electrolytic solutions injected into the soil to form chemical species in an ionic state and then being affected by the electrical potential. Radon is a chemically inert gas unable to form chemical species, and in any case, the continuous injection of electrolytic solutions underneath houses is clearly not an option. Here, it will demonstrated that the same radioactivity of the soil responsible for the generation of radon might also provide a key for its removal. Utilizing a simplified physical model, it was shown that owing to radioactive background surrounding the pores of the soil through which radon travels toward the surface, they become the preferential centers of ionization, and in fact, for very small pores (through which rocks and specially granite stones absorb and diffuse gases), they are positively polarized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


  1. Iyer R. Electrokinetic remediation. Int J Particulate Sci Technol Int J 2011;9(3): 219–28.

  2. World Health Organization (WHO) (2009). Handbook on indoor radon: a public health perspective. 94 p. ISBN: 9789241547673. WHO Library Cataloging in-Publication Data

  3. Cothern CR, Smith JE. Environmental radon. Environ Sci Res. 1987;35: 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0473-7

  4. Handbook of radon in buildings: detection, safety, & control. Baltimore, MD: Mueller Associates, SYSCON Corporation, Brookhaven National Laboratory; 1976.

  5. Miao T, Pan T. A multiphysics model for evaluating electrokinetic remediation of nuclear waste-contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 2015; 77(2015): 226.

  6. Cameselle C. Electrokinetic remediation and other physico-chemical remediation techniques for in situ treatment of soil from contaminated nuclear and NORM sites; Environmental remediation and restoration of contaminated nuclear and norm sites. Cambridge (Sawston): Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy; 2015, pp. 161–84.

  7. Prozorov L, Shcheglov MY, Nikolaevsky VB, Shevtsova EV, Korneva SA. The influence of electric parameters on the dynamics of the electrokinetic decontamination of soils. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2000; 246(3): 571–4.

  8. Gavrilescu M, Pavel LV, Cretescu I. Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium. J Hazard Mater 2009; 163(2–3): 475–510.

  9. Chen XJ, Liu J, Wang L, Qi LL. Influence of pore size distribution of different metamorphic grade of coal on adsorption constant. J China Coal Soc 2013; 38: 294.

  10. Gray LH. An ionization method for the absolute measurement of γ-ray energy. Proc R Soc A 1936; 156: 578–96.

  11. Smirnov BM. Physics of ionized gases. New York: John Wiley; 2001.

  12. Walter AB, Reynolds AB. Fast breeder reactors. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press; 1981.

  13. Glasstone S. Principles of nuclear reactor engineering. New York: The Van Nostrand Company; 1955.

  14. Lieberman MA, Lichtenberg AJ. Principles of plasma discharges and materials processing (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2005.

  15. Benenson W, Harris JW, Stöcker H, Lutz H. Handbook of physics. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.

  16. Viehland LA. Gaseous ion mobility, diffusion, and reaction. Switzerland: Springer; 2018.

  17. Daulta R, Garg VK, Singh B. Natural radioactivity in soil, associated radiation exposure and cancer risk to population of Eastern Haryana, India. J Geol Soc India 2019; 94: 525–32.

  18. Bate DR. Atomic and molecular processes. New York and London: Academic Press; 1962.

  19. Shang X, Zhang Z, Xu X, Liu T, Xing Y. Mineral composition, pore structures, and mechanical characteristics of pyroxene granite exposed to heat treatments. Minerals 2019; 9: 553.

Published
2020-11-06
Section
Original Research Articles