Radon risk assessment and mitigation deadlines

  • Gianluca Bertoni ECONS SA, Bioggio, Switzerland
  • Thammiris M. El Hajj Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Poços de Caldas, Brazil
  • Mauro Gandolla ECONS SA, Bioggio, Switzerland
Keywords: graded approach, radon risk, radon mitigation, effective dose coefficients, effective doses, natural radioactivity, reference levels, indoor air quality


Background: Radon is a radioactive natural gas that is the leading cause of death from lung cancer in non-smokers. It is responsible for the highest share of the yearly effective doses a person is exposed to, and, in many cases, it is the most important indoor pollutant. National regulations on radon typically use derived reference levels, except for occupationally exposed workers that are monitored using a graded approach (e.g. in Switzerland and EU). However, in some countries, radon concentrations in dwellings or workplaces are high and the effective doses are comparable, and even greater than those measured in occupational workplaces. The times spent in different places and the presence of children or disabled people (that usually spend more time indoor) bring a need for assessing the risks of indoor radon exposure using a graded approach for both dwellings and workplaces. It is essential to highlight that the Covid-19 pandemic made more people work from home, and this new situation may be permanent for some workers.

Objective and Design: On this basis, the objectives of this work are to demonstrate the importance of adequate monitoring of natural radioactivity, simulate effective doses due to radon with the new effective dose coefficients (EDCs) proposed by International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (publication 137), show case studies that illustrate the need for effective dose calculation and propose a method to set radon mitigation deadlines for buildings with high radon activity concentrations. Moreover, this work will shed light in the question about the possible need for new radon reference levels after the new EDCs were proposed.

Conclusions: One important outcome of this work is the application of the dose approach in a case study conducted in a dwelling, the measurements and calculations show high annual effective doses (up to 350 mSv/year).


Download data is not yet available.


  1. El Hajj TM, Gandolla MPA, Cardoso da Silva PS, Lopes Julião E, Gutiérrez Villanueva JL, Delboni Junior H. A method for radiologically evaluating indoor use of dimension stone considering radon exhalation rates. J Eur Radon Assoc 2020; 1–15. Available from: https://radonjournal.net/index.php/radon/article/view/3632 [cited 08 June 2021]

  2. ICRP. Radiological Protection against Radon Exposure ICRP publication 126. Ann ICRP 2014; 43(3): 5–73.

  3. Slovic P. The perception gap: radiation and risk. Bull At Sci 2012; 68(3): 67–75. doi: 10.1177/0096340212444870

  4. World Health Organization. WHO handbook on indoor radon a public health perspective 2014. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press.

  5. ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2007.

  6. ICRP. ICRP Publication 137: Occupational intakes of radionuclides: Part 3. Ann ICRP; 2017. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  7. Harrison JD, Marsh JW. ICRP recommendations on radon. Ann ICRP 2020; 49(1_suppl): 68–76. doi: 10.1177/0146645320931974

  8. Kümmel M, Dushe C, Müller S, Gehrcke K. Outdoor 222Rn-concentrations in Germany – part 1 – natural background. J Environ Radioact 2014; 132: 123–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.01.012

  9. Commission CNS. Natural background radiation. 2013. Available from: https://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/resources/fact-sheets/natural-background-radiation.cfm. [cited 9 November 2020].

  10. World Health Organization. Radiation: the chernobyl accident. 2011. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-chernobyl-accident [cited 19 November 2020].

  11. Swiss Federal Office for Civil Protection. Daily mean values. 2020. Available from: https://www.naz.ch/en/aktuell/tagesmittelwerte.shtml [cited 19 November 2020].

  12. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A citizen’s guide to radon – the guide to protecting yourself and your family from radon. Epa Gov 2012; May: 16. Available from: www.epa.gov/radon [cited 08 June 2021]

  13. World Nuclear Association. Some comparative whole-body radiation doses and their effects. London: World Nuclear Association; August 2015.

  14. Hosoda M, Tokonami S, Sorimachi A, Monzen S, Osanai M, Yamada M, et al. The time variation of dose rate artificially increased by the Fukushima nuclear crisis. Sci Rep 2011; 1: 2–6. doi: 10.1038/srep00087

  15. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS). Limit values in radiation protection. Available from: https://www.bfs.de/EN/topics/ion/radiation-protection/limit-values/limit-values_node.html [cited 18 August 2020].

  16. Møller AP, Mousseau TA. The effects of natural variation in background radioactivity on humans, animals and other organisms. Biol Rev 2013; 88(1): 226–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00249.x

  17. World Nuclear News. Japan to raise worker emergency radiation exposure limits. 2015. Available from: https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS-Japan-to-raise-worker-emergency-radiation-exposure-limits-2101154.html#:~:text=Japan’s nuclear regulator is to,at the Fukushima Daiichi plant [cited 18 August 2020].

  18. Fojtíková I, Ženatá I, Timková J. Radon in workplaces-Czech approach to Eu Bss implementation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017; 177(1–2): 104–11. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncx180

  19. European Commission. Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom. Off J Eur Union 2014; 1–73.

  20. ICRP. Summary of ICRP recommendations on radon. Int Comm Radiol Prot ICRP 2018; 3–8.

  21. Calamosca M, Penzo S, Rossetti M, Mustapha OA. Meeting new challenges in radon measurements service with solid state alpha track analysis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2007; 125(1–4): 576–80. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm217

  22. Ufficio federale della sanità pubblica UFSP. Istruzioni in materia di radon. 2019. Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/it/home/gesund-leben/umwelt-und-gesundheit/strahlung-radioaktivitaet-schall/radon/richt-grenzwerte.html [cited 06 March 2021]

  23. Norwegian Ministries. Strategy for the reduction of radon exposure in Norway. Strategy 2010; 13.

  24. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority. New Swedish action plan for reducing the health effects of radon. 2018. Available from: https://www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/en/press/news/2018/new-swedish-action-plan-for-reducing-the-health-effects-of-radon/ [cited 28 November 2020].

  25. Estonian Ministry of the Environment. National Radon Action Plan Tallin 2019. Estonia, Tallin; 2019.

  26. Federal Office of Public Health (Switzerland). Radon action plan 2021. Bern, Switzerland: Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA.

  27. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS). Reference value. Available from: https://www.bfs.de/EN/topics/ion/environment/radon/regulations/reference-value.html [cited 18 August 2020].

How to Cite
Bertoni G., El Hajj T. M., & Gandolla M. (2022). Radon risk assessment and mitigation deadlines. Journal of the European Radon Association, 3. https://doi.org/10.35815/radon.v3.7790
Original Research Articles