Continuous measurements of radon and radon progeny in various public places

  • Kremena Ivanova National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Zdenka Stojanovska Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University of Stip, Stip, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Bistra Kunovska National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Desislava Djunakova National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Jana Djounova National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Nina Chobanova National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
Keywords: radon progeny, direct measurement, working place, building with public access

Abstract

The exposure to radon in buildings open to the public and at workplaces depends on many factors, for example, forms of utilization, construction conditions, time of exposure, heating, and ventilation conditions, etc. To evaluate the radon exposure in different working environments, continuous simultaneous measurements of radon (CRn), equilibrium equivalent (EEC), and potential alpha energy (PAEC) concentrations for 24 hours were performed using AlphaE for CRn and DOSEman PRO from SARAD GmbH for EEC and PAEC measurements. The study considered measurements at three locations in the radon-rich spa of Narechen, Asenovgrad, and at an old mine turned museum in the town of Pernik. A comparison was made between the average values of the concentrations relating to all-day and only working hours when the measurements were completed. The CRn increases during the working hours in the museum as well as in the bath of the spa, while it decreases in the spa’s treatment room. On the other hand, the EEC and PAEC are increasing at all locations. The concentrations increasing due to working hours, which are integrated into long-term measurements can cause underestimated radon exposures in radon reach working environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


1.
Darby S, Whitley E, Silcocks P, Thakrar B, Green M, Lomas P, et al. Risk of lung cancer associated with residential radon exposure in south-west England: a case-control study. Br J Cancer 1998; 78: 394–408. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.506


2.
World Health Organization. WHO handbook on indoor radon a public health perspective. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2014.


3.
ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37(2–4): 1–332.


4.
Ivanova K, Dzhunakova D, Stojanovska Z, Djounova J, Kunovska B, Chobanova N. Analysis of exposure to radon in Bulgarian rehabilitation hospitals. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2022; 29(13): 19098–108. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17143-9


5.
ICRP. Protection against radon-222 at home and work. ICRP Publication 65. Ann ICRP 1993; 23(2): 1–45. doi: 10.1016/0146-6453(93)90023-2


6.
ICRP. Occupational intakes of radionuclides, Part 3. ICRP Publication 137. Ann ICRP 2017; 46(3/4): 1–486. doi: 10.1177/0146645317734963


7.
Kávási N, Somlai J, Vigh T, Tokonami S, Ishikawa T, Sorimachi A, et al. Difficulties in the dose estimate of workers originated from radon and radon progeny in a manganese mine. Radiat Meas 2009; 44(3): 300–5. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.03.014


8.
Müllerová M, Mazur J, Csordás A, Grzadziel D, Holý K, Kovács T, et al. Preliminary results of radon survey in the kindergartens of V4 countries. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017; 177(1–2): 95–8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncx155
Published
2022-10-21
How to Cite
Ivanova K., Stojanovska Z., Kunovska B., Djunakova D., Djounova J., & Chobanova N. (2022). Continuous measurements of radon and radon progeny in various public places. Journal of the European Radon Association, 3. https://doi.org/10.35815/radon.v3.8805
Section
Special issue RAP 2022 conference