Radon levels in dwellings and workplaces: a comparison with data from some European countries
Abstract
Background: According to 2013 European Basic Safety Standards (EU BSS), legal and administrative consequences of having an area declared as radon priority area (RPA) concern workplaces (WP) and public buildings, as well as dwellings (DW). However, RPAs in many cases are defined as higher levels of indoor radon in DW. The reason is that most data are available for DW. So far, indoor radon data for WP (except for schools) and public buildings are scarce.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare indoor radon levels in DW and WP in a given area and to evaluate whether they have different distributions and different average levels.
Design: Austria, Finland, Germany, and Italy provided indoor radon data on DW and WP.
Data related to WP were aggregated in the same grid, as already done for data on DW, to update the European Indoor Radon Map. Based on 10 km × 10 km grid cells, the same statistics are computed for both datasets. Thus, two structurally equal datasets for each country were generated to be statistically compared.
Results and conclusions: Generally, there are numerous indoor radon data on DW than data on WP. Statistical analysis suggests that in all the countries, indoor radon levels – in terms of arithmetic mean (AM) of the natural logarithm-transformed data – in WP and DW are statistically different (P < 0.05), as well as from those referring to schools. The difference in distributions is neither attributable to the effect of geology nor to the effect of different sample sizes.
The correlation between aggregated data is positive in the sense that if the mean (over grid cells) radon concentration increases in DW, it increases in WP as well. Compared with DW, in all countries indoor radon levels in WP seem to be statistically different, but the results are not enough to draw final conclusions: on-purpose designed surveys could be a useful tool to better understand this phenomenon.
Downloads
References
- European Commission. Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Off. J. Eur. Union, 17.1.2014, L 13, 1–70.
- Pantelić G, Čeliković I, Živanović M, Vukanac I, Nikolić JK, Cinelli G, et al. Qualitative overview of indoor radon surveys in Europe. J Environ Radioact 2019; 204: 163–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.04.010
- European Commission. Radiation Protection 193. Radon in workplaces - Implementing the requirements in Councile Directive 2013/59/Euratom. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020, ISBN 978-92-76-10531-2, ISSN 2315-2826, doi: 10.2833/552398
- Bucci S, Pratesi G, Viti ML, Pantani M, Bochicchio F, Venoso G. Radon in workplaces: first results of an extensive survey and comparison with radon in homes. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011; 145(2–3): 202–5. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr040
- Žunić ZS, Bossew P, Bochicchio F, Veselinovic N, Carpentieri C, Venoso G, et al. The relation between radon in schools and in dwellings: a case study in a rural region of Southern Serbia. J Environ Radioact 2017; 167: 188–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.11.024
- Espinosa G, Golzarri JI, Angeles A, Griffith RV. Nationwide survey of radon levels in indoor workplaces in Mexico using nuclear track methodology. Radiat Meas 2009; 44(9-10): 1051–4. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.10.035
- EMPIR 16ENV10. MetroRADON: metrology for radon monitoring 2017–2020. Available from http://metroradon.eu/
- Cinelli G, Tollefsen T, Bossew P, Gruber V, Bogucarskis K, De Felice L, et al. Digital version of the European Atlas of natural radiation. J Environ Radioact 2019; 196: 240–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.02.008
- Cinelli G, De Cort M, Tollefsen T, Achatz M, Ajtić J, Ballabio C, et al. European Atlas of natural radiation. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019, ISBN 978-92-76-08259-0.
- Bhattacharya PK, Burman P. Multivariate analysis. In: Theory Methods Statistics. Academic Press; 1st edition (June 10, 2016), 383–429, ISBN-10: 0128024402, doi: 10.1016/B9780128024409.000126
- IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
- Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: PAleontological STatistics software Package for Education and Data Analysis version 4.08. Natural History Museum – University of Oslo. Available from: https://www.nhm.uio.no/english/research/infrastructure/past/.
- Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 2001; 4: 1–9.
- Casella G. Berger RL. Statistical inference. 2nd ed. 2021. Cengage Learning. Boston, Massachusetts, USA. ISBN 9780534243128.
- Carroll RJ, Ruppert D. The use and misuse of orthogonal regression in linear errors-in-variables models. Am Stat 1996; 50(1): 1–6. doi: 10.2307/2685035
- Carr JR. Orthogonal regression: a teaching perspective. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 2012; 43(1): 134–43. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2011.573876
- Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2006; 81(2): 259–91. doi: 10.1017/S1464793106007007
- Bossew P. Radon: exploring the log-normal mystery. J Environ Radioact 2010; 101(10): 826–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.05.005
- Cinelli G, Tondeur F. Log-normality of indoor radon data in the Walloon region of Belgium. J Environ Radioact 2015; 143: 100–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.02.014
- Olsson U. Confidence intervals for the mean of a log-normal distribution. J Stat Educ 2005; 13(1): null-null. doi: 10.1080/10691898.2005.11910638
